bladup wrote: Sanctuary wrote:
Roy, don't you think this great news needs it's own thread because most people who tap on this thread will have nearly it all in unread red letters and your news will get lost umongst all that as it's only us few who've read it all, it's great news though and we've ordered one [it's great price] and it's also great news about "ALIW" getting a reprint as well, give the book it's own thread so everyone who looks on here [not just the people who talk] can know about it, you and your new book deserve that.
Thanks Paul, yes just got your order through. Was a bit reluctant to start a separate thread as certain people will slay me for advertising. Mind you this thread has been going on for so long now that it's been like one big advert :-)
Okay will do one. Cheers, Roy
Reply | with quote | Posted by Sanctuary 29th March 2013ce 14:49 |
Trethevy Quoit in danger (Sanctuary, Feb 27, 2013, 18:29)- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (tjj, Feb 27, 2013, 19:01)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (Squid Tempest, Feb 27, 2013, 19:16)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (thesweetcheat, Feb 27, 2013, 19:33)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (Littlestone, Feb 28, 2013, 10:36)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger/Nigel (Sanctuary, Mar 05, 2013, 13:58)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger/Dymond Ground Plan (Sanctuary, Mar 06, 2013, 10:18)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (The Heritage Trust, Mar 08, 2013, 15:57)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (harestonesdown, Mar 08, 2013, 16:12)
- OT (juamei, Mar 08, 2013, 17:51)
- Re: OT (nigelswift, Mar 08, 2013, 17:58)
- Re: OT (juamei, Mar 08, 2013, 18:03)
- Re: OT (harestonesdown, Mar 08, 2013, 17:59)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (bladup, Mar 08, 2013, 16:29)
|
|