The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian

Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Avebury Forum Start a topic | Search
Avebury
Re: In summary...
761 messages
Select a forum:
bladup wrote:
Mustard wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
Mustard wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
Keep dreaming.

Would it hurt you to just be POLITE??? You don't want the stones re-erected - fine. That's your right, to hold that opinion and to argue for it. But there's no need to be so bloody rude to people who hold a different view.


If you wasn't so bloody rude yourself you might understand that others weren't. Pot calling the kettle black !!!


Rubbish. Bladup made a perfectly civil and positive post. You disagree with re-erection - fine. You've already established this. So why did you need to respond with a mean-spirited and dismissive comment that added absolutely nothing to his post?


Thank you Mustard, we know how he feels about it, i respect that, but not the fact he keeeeeeeeeeeeps saying it, this is just negative bollocks.



Can we please keep it civil ?
I know that's a bit "ripe" coming from me but there's really no need for expletives and such, they add nothing. :)


Reply | with quote
harestonesdown
Posted by harestonesdown
23rd January 2013ce
21:51

In reply to:

Re: In summary... (bladup)

2 replies:

Re: In summary... (tjj)
Re: In summary... (bladup)

Messages in this topic: