Sanctuary wrote: bladup wrote: Sanctuary wrote: bladup wrote: You should suggest it to the people who are going to do the enhancement to the stone circles, If you don't ask you don't get, really just a date would be nice.
All in hand so watch this space!
Great stuff.
Interesting what PastScape concludes with:-
'There are no traces of associated linear banks or earthworks. The origins and purpose of the enclosure remains obscure but the effort required to both excavate or import material for a bank of such proportions and to erect the slabs suggests that it had a more important function than just an animal pound'.
I totally agree, for me as soon as you look to Brittany it makes a lot more sense, and is the best way to guess it's age [late neolithic - early bronze age i'd say], I "feel" ritual and i felt it there [as it sounds like you did too], an animal pound no matter how flash wouldn't "feel" like that, I can't help thinking of a sacred pond, a ancient man made Dozmany pool if you like [a bit smaller granted], but with Arthur links again, I wonder if the middle is empty of finds because if it was a sacred pond it could be full of finds and offerings [They'd soon excavate it if they thought that].
Reply | with quote | Posted by bladup 12th January 2013ce 12:14 |
King Arthur's Down double stone circle (Sanctuary, Jan 05, 2013, 08:48)- Re: King Arthur's Down double stone circle (moss, Jan 05, 2013, 10:18)
- Re: King Arthur's Down double stone circle (Littlestone, Jan 05, 2013, 11:13)
- Re: King Arthur's Down double stone circle (bladup, Jan 05, 2013, 22:42)
- Re: King Arthur's Down double stone circle (Littlestone, Jan 09, 2013, 09:48)
|
|