CARL wrote: I don't have a problem with reconstructed sites as long as it is as faithful and accurate as possible.
It is also nice to visit a site to see what it would have looked like in its prime (as close as possible)
Something is certainly better than nothing!
I agree although sometimes it may be better not to know that it's been reconstructed as long as it is true to form as I find it take the 'edge' off it for me.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Sanctuary 30th March 2012ce 08:20 |
Stonea (reconstructed) Camp (GLADMAN, Mar 29, 2012, 20:02)- Re: Stonea (reconstructed) Camp (thesweetcheat, Mar 29, 2012, 20:54)
- Re: Stonea (reconstructed) Camp (CARL, Mar 30, 2012, 08:06)
- Re: Stonea (reconstructed) Camp (Sanctuary, Mar 30, 2012, 08:20)
- Re: Stonea (reconstructed) Camp (tomatoman, Mar 31, 2012, 10:45)
|
|