I'm maybe too obtuse to see it...I can't find the "controversy"...I can see bits where the "established academics" might dismiss due to the contradictory nature(IMO...and this might just be due to my lack of understanding) of some sentences...but nothing controversial (again IMO) obvious. Perhaps the amount of hours spent and the areas covered over this 8 year period seems, to the academics, insufficient....Just an idea. You might well be right and because you aren't of their "status" perhaps they are dismissing you as an interfering amateur.....If I've read the report wrong I'd appreciate the controversial bits cut & pasted in bold....cheers
Reply | with quote | Posted by Resonox 1st February 2012ce 10:15 |
The problem with academics... (rockhopper, Jan 31, 2012, 11:50)- Re: The problem with academics... (The Sea Cat, Jan 31, 2012, 11:29)
- Re: The problem with academics... (Andrew Joseph, Jan 31, 2012, 12:05)
- Re: The problem with academics... (VBB, Jan 31, 2012, 14:12)
- Re: The problem with academics... (Mart, Jan 31, 2012, 20:35)
- Re: The problem with academics... (Howburn Digger, Jan 31, 2012, 22:05)
- Re: The problem with academics... (Robot Emperor, Feb 01, 2012, 10:44)
- Re: The problem with academics... (Rhiannon, Feb 02, 2012, 16:44)
- Re: The problem with academics... (wychburyman, Feb 04, 2012, 13:32)
|
|