juamei wrote: To someone who generally steers clear of this sort of thing, it does seem like an organised attack on Goffik under the guises of defending TJJ is taking place.
I have no desire to restart anything, but in view of the above, for the record my post below was an entirely individual reaction to what I read as a clearly intentional snub, where June's contribution was pointedly omitted. My post was not in any way part of an "organised attack" on Goff. His post was inflammatory in my opinion.
Life's too short, so I'm glad to see the thread back on course.
This topic is locked | Posted by thesweetcheat 1st September 2011ce 19:22 |
Avebury footpath partly destroyed (head-first, Aug 27, 2011, 21:48)- Re: Avebury footpath partly destroyed (tjj, Aug 27, 2011, 21:08)
- Re: Avebury footpath partly destroyed (scubi63, Aug 28, 2011, 10:02)
- Re: Avebury footpath partly destroyed (tjj, Aug 30, 2011, 09:05)
- The law! (juamei, Aug 30, 2011, 09:16)
- Re: Avebury footpaths (VBB, Aug 30, 2011, 13:56)
|
|