moss wrote: Sanctuary wrote:
Goff. June was only acting on information she had been given or heard at the time and was just advising others on the possibility. There is no need to keep raking it up in the form of little jibes whenever the opportunity arises as it doesn't sit well with many people and rightly so. This list is doing fine at the moment with folk pulling together, let's keep it that way.
Roy
Could we all just leave off harassing Goff with such condescending tones please!
I never speak up normally preferring a quiet life but this continuing sidetracking of a thread gets my goat. The thread subject was about ploughing of a public footpath. Goff has been 'got at' enough with other emails, and a distinct tone of 'holier than though' appears to be the result of a continuing thread of action to put him down.
Goff is a dear friend, light of heart and funny, long may he be part of this forum...
Moss x
Sorry Moss but it was Goff that sidetracked and in doing so took a swipe and opened an old wound that was healing well. Putting a :D after a sentence doesn't make it right, but more thought beforehand would to avoid misunderstandings. Nuff said.
This topic is locked | Posted by Sanctuary 1st September 2011ce 10:21 |
Avebury footpath partly destroyed (head-first, Aug 27, 2011, 21:48)- Re: Avebury footpath partly destroyed (tjj, Aug 27, 2011, 21:08)
- Re: Avebury footpath partly destroyed (scubi63, Aug 28, 2011, 10:02)
- Re: Avebury footpath partly destroyed (tjj, Aug 30, 2011, 09:05)
- The law! (juamei, Aug 30, 2011, 09:16)
- Re: Avebury footpaths (VBB, Aug 30, 2011, 13:56)
|
|