It's a real shame because rather boils down to someone's greed to make money out of sticking houses on it and selling them. Which many people will say is perfectly legitimate of course. But I prefer greenery and trees and there are surely loads of places that are already ruined that you can stick houses on. I had a read of the document about trying to have it registered as a village green, there were lots of people supporting it weren't there.
If it's really as boggy as you suggest perhaps they'll be put off by that, surely added work and money to sort out, who wants to live in a swamp with their foundations sinking. Or maybe you can find some rare newts or something...
Reply | with quote | Posted by Rhiannon 1st August 2012ce 13:10 |
Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Seventhorn Inn, Jul 25, 2009, 13:29)- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Amberlady, Jul 27, 2009, 21:18)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (megadread, Jul 28, 2009, 00:07)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Rhiannon, Jul 28, 2009, 07:58)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (goffik, Jul 28, 2009, 09:57)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Cheema Deepinder, Aug 01, 2009, 14:35)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 00:28)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 00:32)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 00:43)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 11:05)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Rhiannon, Aug 01, 2012, 13:10)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Sep 15, 2012, 11:29)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Nov 08, 2012, 18:25)
|
|