Rhiannon wrote: Aren't you two being a bit harsh? Surely someone wanting to save a bit of their local history and a green site at that deserves some sympathy?? Sounds like the usual tale of people selling off tiny corners of land just to make a fast buck and put some houses on them. If it's privately owned I don't know how much luck you'll have... let's hope there are some very rare species on there, or some other planning regulation that'll help you.
Aye, wanting to resist the march of development into any remaining green bits of this overcrowded island ought to attract a bit of sympathy. Let's face it, it's not a game of chess, it's a war. Someone wants to make personal gain at the expense of the communal interest.... and Tarmac et al will use any trick in the book so why shouldn't their opponents? Smooth snakes should be used - even if they have to be shipped in. ;)
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 28th July 2009ce 09:21 |
Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Seventhorn Inn, Jul 25, 2009, 13:29)- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Amberlady, Jul 27, 2009, 21:18)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (megadread, Jul 28, 2009, 00:07)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Rhiannon, Jul 28, 2009, 07:58)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (nigelswift, Jul 28, 2009, 09:21)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (goffik, Jul 28, 2009, 09:57)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Cheema Deepinder, Aug 01, 2009, 14:35)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 00:28)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 00:32)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 00:43)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 11:05)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Sep 15, 2012, 11:29)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Nov 08, 2012, 18:25)
|
|