This picture of the Hags Chair features a possible representation of the plough,
http://www.themodernantiquaria[...]post/44244/images/cairn_t.html
however it's also a good illustration of how the evidence can be 'bent' to fit the theory. If you look at the illustration in Fergusson's book (p.215) the lines that join the cups into the shape just don't exist. In other words the picture has been doctored.
Reply | with quote | Posted by fitzcoraldo 27th March 2008ce 13:08 |
Theories on 'cup and ring marks' (12pointer, Feb 27, 2008, 14:22)- Re: Theories on 'cup and ring marks' (Seph, Mar 12, 2008, 07:21)
- Re: Theories on 'cup and ring marks' (Rhiannon, Mar 12, 2008, 13:42)
- Re: Theories on 'cup and ring marks' (Hob, Mar 12, 2008, 14:46)
- Re: Theories on 'cup and ring marks' (Snap, Mar 24, 2008, 11:19)
- Re: Theories on 'cup and ring marks' (fitzcoraldo, Mar 27, 2008, 10:21)
- Re: Theories on 'cup and ring marks' (12pointer, Mar 28, 2008, 12:12)
|
|