Sorry, thought the point you were making was that...
"The National Trust is at times derided for their profit making strategies around some of our most loved sites but this at least gives an insight into the care-taking role they fulfil and, in scenarios like this, what a thankless task that role can be."
When we know that, "...their profit making strategies include things like taking a couple of thousand quid from Big Brother to make a mockery of the Uffington Horse..." and consent to a film being made showing cyclist riding up and down the Avebury bank and ditch when they themselves have banned such activities.
I'm sure you're right however and I've yet again missed the point ;-)
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Littlestone
3rd October 2007ce
21:23 |
Fathers for justice.. (Rhiannon, Oct 03, 2007, 11:37)- Re: Fathers for justice.. (Mustard, Oct 03, 2007, 11:42)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (handofdave, Oct 04, 2007, 02:54)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (Wiggy, Oct 04, 2007, 10:59)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (scubi63, Oct 04, 2007, 11:51)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (Cursuswalker, Oct 04, 2007, 17:23)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (Cursuswalker, Oct 04, 2007, 17:29)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (nigelswift, Oct 11, 2007, 08:41)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (neighbourofthedrude, Oct 11, 2007, 13:33)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Fathers for justice.. (tjj)