Littlestone wrote: "Although the Lewis wind farm is onshore, it's more offshore, as it offshore to the areas it will be supplying."
BBC Radio news this morning.
I hear that too - how ridiculous is that? Didn't "offshore" used to mean, erm... "off shore"? IE "in the sea"?
Maybe "offshore" in this case means "quite a long way and out of site of Surrey". And Lewis being ONLY the third largest of the British Isles... Tsk!
G x
[edit: And from Trish's post:
The BBC website wrote: Under the Lewis proposals, 181 turbines would be built
Plans for one of Europe's largest onshore wind farms have been approved by the Western Isles Council.
The twats.]
Reply | with quote | Posted by goffik 16th February 2007ce 09:20 |
Lewis wind farm (Trish, Feb 15, 2007, 08:49)- Re: Lewis wind farm (goffik, Feb 15, 2007, 09:37)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (nigelswift, Feb 15, 2007, 10:01)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (moss, Feb 15, 2007, 10:55)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (goffik, Feb 15, 2007, 13:22)
- wind on the coast (Merrick, Feb 15, 2007, 14:16)
- Re: wind on the coast (goffik, Feb 15, 2007, 15:50)
- Re: wind on the coast (Trish, Feb 16, 2007, 08:21)
- Re: wind on the coast (nigelswift, Feb 16, 2007, 08:53)
- Re: wind on the coast (Littlestone, Feb 16, 2007, 09:10)
- Re: wind on the coast (goffik, Feb 16, 2007, 09:20)
- Re: wind on the coast (ian mccall, Mar 23, 2007, 11:53)
- Re: wind on the coast (anthonyqkiernan, Feb 16, 2007, 10:20)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (slumpystones, Feb 16, 2007, 23:21)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (tuesday, Mar 24, 2007, 10:11)
|
|