"We fully respect the decision to ask for the removal of the five turbines from our revised proposal and believe that it is still large enough to deliver the key objectives we set"
I'll bet you do. And I bet you budgeted for the loss of a lot more than five so you've done fantastically well.
That Delboy gets everywhere doesn't he?
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 16th February 2007ce 08:53 |
Lewis wind farm (Trish, Feb 15, 2007, 08:49)- Re: Lewis wind farm (goffik, Feb 15, 2007, 09:37)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (nigelswift, Feb 15, 2007, 10:01)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (moss, Feb 15, 2007, 10:55)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (goffik, Feb 15, 2007, 13:22)
- wind on the coast (Merrick, Feb 15, 2007, 14:16)
- Re: wind on the coast (goffik, Feb 15, 2007, 15:50)
- Re: wind on the coast (Trish, Feb 16, 2007, 08:21)
- Re: wind on the coast (nigelswift, Feb 16, 2007, 08:53)
- Re: wind on the coast (ian mccall, Mar 23, 2007, 11:53)
- Re: wind on the coast (anthonyqkiernan, Feb 16, 2007, 10:20)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (slumpystones, Feb 16, 2007, 23:21)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (tuesday, Mar 24, 2007, 10:11)
|
|