Merrick wrote: There are vast areas of coastal land much more suitable - golf courses. More stable than peat, and we'd be reclaiming them from their lawn chemical hell, and getting some balance frmo the overconsuming twats who play golf. Turbine the fucking lot i reckon.
Yeah! And I can't imagine a load of golfers causing too much of a problem either, if that's their idea of exercise! ;o)
Isn't it also true, though, that the turbines cannot operate if the wind is too strong? Over 60mph, or summat? From what I understand, that's a large chunk of the Hebridean calendar! :o)
G x
Reply | with quote | Posted by goffik 15th February 2007ce 15:50 |
Lewis wind farm (Trish, Feb 15, 2007, 08:49)- Re: Lewis wind farm (goffik, Feb 15, 2007, 09:37)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (nigelswift, Feb 15, 2007, 10:01)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (moss, Feb 15, 2007, 10:55)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (goffik, Feb 15, 2007, 13:22)
- wind on the coast (Merrick, Feb 15, 2007, 14:16)
- Re: wind on the coast (goffik, Feb 15, 2007, 15:50)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (slumpystones, Feb 16, 2007, 23:21)
- Re: Lewis wind farm (tuesday, Mar 24, 2007, 10:11)
|
|