> But are you really saying that 'traditional' ways of genrating power are 'greener'?
(Hi Moth)
I appreciate the green power debate and that change must happen or else we are all fried. But as my own particular interest is the landscape (especially my own!) I think the detriment to the landscape outweighs the advantages. Remote country areas are easy targets for developers and government agencies who bully their way through the planning process without regard to the other strong argument that certain parts of our countryside should be protected from commercial and industrial exploitation.
After all isn't saving the landscape part of saving the planet?
 Reply | with quote | Posted by whatisthat
16th June 2006ce
13:51 |
Sleeping Beauty (pixie1948, Jan 01, 2005, 17:08)- Re: Sleeping Beauty - This Might Help (treaclechops, Jan 01, 2005, 17:52)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (FourWinds, Jan 01, 2005, 19:53)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (suave harv, Jan 01, 2005, 20:01)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (nigelswift, Jan 01, 2005, 20:14)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (smallblueplanet, Jan 01, 2005, 20:28)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (smallblueplanet, Jan 01, 2005, 22:41)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (BrigantesNation, Jan 02, 2005, 11:13)
- Re: Devastation in pictures (smallblueplanet, Jan 01, 2005, 23:51)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (Littlestone, Jan 05, 2005, 20:54)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (FourWinds, Jun 16, 2006, 10:37)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (geniet, Jun 21, 2006, 17:15)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Sleeping Beauty (Moth)