The problem with the power that is going to be produced in the wind-farms here on Lewis is, the power is not staying here it is going direct to the national grid. The revenues generated by rents etc. are going into land owners and crofters hands - giving them yet another reason to stop using the earth as a sustainable means of living, and in many respects adding one more nail to the coffin of crofting.
Also James Lovelock's daughter is very much against windfarms, and this is a woman brought up to believe in the Gaia/Mother Earth theory. (And no I dont think its a "teenage" rebellion before you ask)
Reply | with quote | Posted by norriethedead 6th March 2005ce 15:49 |
Sleeping Beauty (pixie1948, Jan 01, 2005, 17:08)- Re: Sleeping Beauty - This Might Help (treaclechops, Jan 01, 2005, 17:52)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (FourWinds, Jan 01, 2005, 19:53)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (suave harv, Jan 01, 2005, 20:01)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (nigelswift, Jan 01, 2005, 20:14)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (smallblueplanet, Jan 01, 2005, 20:28)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (nigelswift, Jan 01, 2005, 20:36)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (smallblueplanet, Jan 01, 2005, 20:50)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (nigelswift, Jan 01, 2005, 21:04)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (smallblueplanet, Jan 01, 2005, 21:09)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (FourWinds, Jan 01, 2005, 21:58)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (smallblueplanet, Jan 01, 2005, 22:07)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (FourWinds, Jan 01, 2005, 22:28)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (norriethedead, Mar 06, 2005, 15:49)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (smallblueplanet, Jan 01, 2005, 22:16)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (norriethedead, Mar 06, 2005, 15:44)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (BrigantesNation, Jan 02, 2005, 11:10)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (smallblueplanet, Jan 01, 2005, 22:41)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (BrigantesNation, Jan 02, 2005, 11:13)
- Re: Devastation in pictures (smallblueplanet, Jan 01, 2005, 23:51)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (Littlestone, Jan 05, 2005, 20:54)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (FourWinds, Jun 16, 2006, 10:37)
- Re: Sleeping Beauty (geniet, Jun 21, 2006, 17:15)
|
|