Rhiannon's right. You'll need the help of McGrail or an Ed to add the sites to your new site group.
The only way to avoid this is if you 'own' all the sites that you're moving or you can persuade the site owners to move 'em for you.
I gather that McGrail isn't around at the moment, so I'd copy the request to the Eds in the hope that one of them might do it. Make it really clear what you're after, otherwise they'll just bounce it back at you with a load of questions (awkward buggers).
:-)#
K x
Reply | with quote | Posted by Kammer 29th October 2003ce 14:13 |
the missing tomb (treehugger-uk, Oct 16, 2003, 15:19)- Re: the missing tomb (Rivington Pike, Oct 16, 2003, 19:08)
- Re: the missing tomb (treehugger-uk, Oct 16, 2003, 22:33)
- Re: Anglezark moor (Hob, Oct 16, 2003, 23:16)
- Re: the missing tomb (Rivington Pike, Oct 17, 2003, 08:03)
- Re: the missing tomb (IronMan, Oct 17, 2003, 10:20)
- All is woe ... (BlueGloves, Oct 17, 2003, 10:46)
- Re: the shearers (Hob, Oct 17, 2003, 11:20)
- Re: the shearers (BlueGloves, Oct 17, 2003, 11:52)
- Re: the shearers (Hob, Oct 17, 2003, 12:33)
- Re: the shearers (BlueGloves, Oct 17, 2003, 15:12)
- Re: Spot the fib (Hob, Oct 17, 2003, 15:34)
- the missing tomb heres an idea (treehugger-uk, Oct 17, 2003, 22:15)
- Re: the missing tomb heres an idea (Rivington Pike, Oct 18, 2003, 07:25)
- many missing tombs (BlueGloves, Oct 18, 2003, 07:47)
- Re: many missing tombs (Hob, Oct 18, 2003, 10:15)
- Re: many missing tombs (Rivington Pike, Oct 18, 2003, 11:24)
- Re: many missing tombs (treehugger-uk, Oct 18, 2003, 17:47)
- Re: many missing tombs (Hob, Oct 19, 2003, 13:37)
- Re: many missing tombs (AtomicMutton, Oct 20, 2003, 08:10)
- FOUND! the missing tomb? (treehugger-uk, Oct 25, 2003, 11:56)
- Re: FOUND! the missing tomb? (BlueGloves, Oct 28, 2003, 07:36)
- Re: FOUND! the missing tomb? (IronMan, Oct 28, 2003, 09:51)
- Anglezarke Group ? (Rivington Pike, Oct 28, 2003, 12:46)
- Re: FOUND! the missing tomb? (baza, Oct 29, 2003, 03:00)
|
|