"You haven't realised it but you've deleted one of the places that has the strongest claim to be included on this database. That's because one of these gold hair tresses was excavated from there in 1935."
Firstly, I didn't delete it, I just pointed out to the editors of this site the reasons why I didn't think it was a site. Secondly, that hair ornament is from a nearby mound, not from the "site" itself. I never understood why you didn't post that mound as a site. Thirdly, I'm not touching any of this with a barge-pole & won't be making any more posts here about it!
Reply | with quote | Posted by TomBo 26th June 2003ce 13:29 |
Hi Jimit. (Kammer, Jun 16, 2003, 14:32)- Re: Hi Jimit. (AtomicMutton, Jun 17, 2003, 09:16)
- Hi AtomicMutton (Kammer, Jun 17, 2003, 13:18)
- Re: Hi Jimit. (jimit, Jun 17, 2003, 14:15)
- Re: Hi atomic mutton (pebblesfromheaven, Jun 18, 2003, 16:18)
- Re: Hi atomic mutton (Jane, Jun 19, 2003, 08:40)
- Re: Hi atomic mutton (pebblesfromheaven, Jun 19, 2003, 09:06)
- mincemeat (AtomicMutton, Jun 19, 2003, 09:20)
- Re: mincemeat (pebblesfromheaven, Jun 19, 2003, 09:25)
- mincing (AtomicMutton, Jun 23, 2003, 21:13)
- Re: mincing (pebblesfromheaven, Jun 24, 2003, 08:28)
- minced (AtomicMutton, Jun 24, 2003, 09:00)
- Re: minced (TomBo, Jun 25, 2003, 15:22)
- mincer man (AtomicMutton, Jun 26, 2003, 04:38)
- Re: mincer man (TomBo, Jun 26, 2003, 13:29)
- Re: mincemeat (Jane, Jun 19, 2003, 10:44)
- George Winn Darley!! (Shestu, Jun 26, 2003, 19:04)
|
|