|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
|
News
British ancient forests were patchyFrom PlanetEarth online What were Britain's primordial forests like before humans started tampering with the environment? The latest clues from a study of fossil beetles suggest that the ancient forest was patchy and varied in density across Britain. Scientists have long debated the nature of Europe's ancient landscape and hesitated between a nightmarish, close-canopied forest and a pasture woodland of oak and hazel trees, similar to the modern New Forest, which is kept open by grazing animals. This is not just an academic question. 'If we want to manage our forests and species to keep them as natural as possible, we have to know what natural is,' says Dr Nicki Whitehouse, a palaeoecologist at Queens University Belfast. 'The traditional view is that the original Holocene woodland in Europe was quite dense with a closed canopy,' she says. 'But this is probably too simplistic and nowadays the debate is more about the degree of openness of the ancient forest and the role of grazing animals in maintaining this structure.' Together with Dr David Smith, a specialist on environmental archaeology at the University of Birmingham, Whitehouse decided to look for clues in an overlooked source: ancient beetle remains. Beetles are a good source of environmental data because it's easy to tell species apart and each type of beetle is specific to a given habitat. Some thrive in dense forests, others prefer sparse woodlands and grassland areas, while dung beetles are usually found in areas grazed by large herbivores. The proportion of beetle species in a given period of time 'allows us to reconstruct past habitats with detail,' explains Whitehouse. Whitehouse and Smith looked at 26 beetle assemblages from different parts of Britain, from Thorne Moors in Yorkshire to Silbury in Hampshire, and looked at how beetle communities changed over 7000 years, since the end of the Ice Age until 4000 years ago. They found that the history of the original British forest is not as straightforward as previously thought. Between 9500 and 6000 BC, the fossils were mostly from open and pasture beetle species, with moderate contributions from forest types and hardly any dung beetles. This suggests open patches of oak, hazel, birch and pine forests of variable tree density, similar to modern pasture woodland. Around 6000 BC forest beetles become more abundant, grassland species decline and 'we see an overall closing of the forest canopy in the insect record,' says Whitehouse. By 4000 BC, everything changes. This was the time that humans started pursuing an agricultural way of life, raising animals for meat and dairy products. Dung beetles become more abundant, while the other types of beetles decrease. 'The transition to the Neolithic was rather abrupt,' says Whitehouse. The dense forest gave way to pasture woodlands and open landscapes, kept open by the increasing number of grazing animals feeding on saplings. The beetles turn the history of the British forest into a complex tale. Instead of a continuous closed canopy forest, Britain was covered by uneven patches of forest, with different levels of openness driven by local phenomena such as storms, forest fires or floods. But grazing animals apparently did not play a role until the beginning of agriculture. The beetle findings, published last week in Quaternary Science Reviews, largely agree with the data collected from the study of ancient pollen. But 'pollen studies have probably over-estimated the abundance of closed canopy trees and under-estimated the more heterogeneous nature of the landscape at this time,' says Whitehouse. 'The Holocene forest was probably patchier than we though: open areas were of local significance and important features of the landscape.' |
Posted by baza30th November 2009ce Edited 30th November 2009ce
|
Comments (3) |
|
|
An intriguing article; NERC funds some worthwhile research and I will make a point of checking their web-site out more often. Its a puzzle though, why would there be open patches of grassland between 9500bc-6000bc changing back to dense forest for two thousand years. Its hard to get your head around it, I wonder if it was down to climate changes. No one has mentioned 'Silbury in Hampshire' yet, it was still in Wiltshire last time I looked. |
Posted by tjj1st December 2009ce |
| Maybe the earlier periods of patchy forestation are to do with the gradual succession and colonisation of the post-glacial landscape after retreat of the ice. Much of the land would have been covered with sterile, rocky moraines, unstable screes and glacial till, with newly forming soils collecting in hollows and valleys. Added to this the gradual slow tailing off of harsh winters, which would perhaps preclude trees getting a serious foothold on less sheltered areas or uplands, and you can see how patchiness would be the norm, decreasing as the climate warmed, soils became more widely distributed and the number of seed-producing trees in the UK began to grow exponentially. |
Posted by BrianT 7th January 2010ce |
| That is really interesting ty |
Posted by satya8th August 2010ce |
| You must be logged in to add a comment | |
Top of page