|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
| 1920 news reports place the cist discovered then, slightly larger than that of 1926, at the back of an old stone stump. One report places it in the mound and the other disna, but this is because one sees the mound as 18' diameter whereas archaeologists 'extend' this to 18m (a 1903 report records that ~20 years previously the O.S knocked a huge chunk off the top of this howe because it was too high !). |
Posted by wideford16th April 2006ce Edited 17th April 2006ce
|
Comments (0) |
|
| You must be logged in to add a comment | |
Top of page