The Modern Antiquarian. Ancient Sites, Stone Circles, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic Mysteries

Staffordshire: Latest Posts

Showing 1-10 of 253 posts. Most recent first | Next 10

Queen's Low (Round Barrow(s)) — Miscellaneous

Details of site on Pastscape

[SJ 96342389] TUMULUS [O.E.]. (1)
Nicholls mentions two barrows named 'King's Low' and 'Queen's Low' on Tixall Heath. This is probably one of them.
[See also SJ 92 SE 1]. (2)
"Lower Hanyards", Barrow, 65' diam. and 6' high. (3)
Ploughed down bowl barrow, 26 m. in average diam. & 0.6m. high. No visible ditch. Under pasture. This feature is shown as a pit (slopes reversed) on O.S. 6". (4)
This is Queen's Low. The authority for the name is Hardwood's Eardswick, 1844, p.70. (5)
This barrow has been further reduced by ploughing and is now 0.3m high. A farm track crosses it, but otherwiseit is under grass. Published survey (1:2500) correct. (6)
(SJ 96342390) Queen's Low(NR). (7)
Tixall:SJ 96342389. Queen's Low Barrow,badly damaged by ploughing; appears to be c.26m in diameter and 0.5m high.A second barrow knownas King's Low (SJ 92 SE 1) lies 1km to the west.A third barrow in this area has been mentioned but no trace of it can be found. (8)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6" 1954.
( 2) General reference "History of N. Staffs", 1933, p.49. (R. Nicholls)
( 3) General reference V.C.H. Staffs, Vol.l, 1908, p.377. (C. Lynam)
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F1 VJB 24-FEB-58
( 5) General reference Letter (Mr.J.S.Horne, 2.3.58)
( 6) Field Investigators Comments F2 DJC 24-SEP-74
( 7) General reference OS 1:10 000 1973
( 8) General reference W Mid Arch 29 1986 CBA Gp 8 42-5
Chance Posted by Chance
8th March 2012ce

King's Low (Round Barrow(s)) — Miscellaneous

Details of site on Pastscape

King's Low - Bowl barrow MONUMENT NO. 77395

(SJ 95452373) Tumulus (NR). (1)
Circular mound. 120' diam. 9' high. (2)
Two barrows are mentioned by Nicholls as being on Tixall Heath. They are named 'King's Low' and 'Queen's Low' (This is probably one of them. See also SJ 92 SE 9). (3)
This is the barrow known as King's Low (a). Bowl barrow, 30.0m in diam and 1.8m high. No visible ditch. Tree planted. On the brow of a southern declivity. (4)
No change to previous information. Published survey (1:2500) correct. (5)
King's Low(NR). (6)

Tixall:SJ 95452373. King's Low. Barrow c 30.0m in diameter and 1.8m high.Planted with larch trees.A second barrow known as Queen's Low (SJ 92 SE 9) lies 1km to the east.A third barrow in this area has been mentioned but no trace of it can be found. (7)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6" 1954
( 2) General reference VCH Staffs 1 1908 377
( 3) General reference Hist of N Staffs 1933 49 (R Nicholls)
( 4a) General reference (Mr S Horne Secretary Old Stafford Soc 24 St John's Rd Rowley Park, Stafford
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F1 VJB 17-JAN-58
( 5) Field Investigators Comments F2 DJC 24-SEP-74
( 6) General reference OS 1:10 000 1973
( 7) General reference W Mids Arch 29 1986 CBA Gp 8 42-5
Chance Posted by Chance
8th March 2012ce

Little Onn (Natural Rock Feature) — Folklore

I can't find mention of this stone anywhere else. And it might not exist any more. But it might, and so I can't resist adding it as it has such typically stoney folklore, plus it's got a cow's footmark, allegedly.
In the village of Little Oun, about eight miles from Stafford, there is a large house, now used as a farm-house, but once inhabited by an old and highly respectable family named C. Close to the side of the road leading to the house, from which it is distant about a hundred yards, lies a large boulder, most likely from Shap Fells, or some other of the Cumberland or Westmoreland hills. It is very large, weighing several tons, and upon the exposed surface of it is an impression not unlike that of a cow’s hoof. Before the following event, the stone was two or three yards above the surface, but now it is not much more than one.

The superstition attached to this stone, - which was and, I may say, still is religiously believed in by the country people for miles around, - was that the fortunes of the C. family were indissolubly linked with the fate of the stone: - that as this latter remained high and elevated as it then was, so would the family be prosperous, and that as the stone subsided, so likewise would the dignity and wealth of the C.s sink. Now it happened, one day, that an ancestor of Lord Bradford was riding to dine at the Hall, when his horse took fright at this large stone and threw his rider, who, I believe, was killed on the spot. The owner of the Hall, to prevent the recurrence of a like accident, caused sixteen horses to be yoked together so as to remove the boulder from the side of the road. However, the stone refused to stir an inch. For this impious attempt, tradition relates that, the poor horses suffered; for the story goes that all the sixteen died of the distemper within a fortnight. A working man was then employed to dig away the soil from around and beneath it, so as to sink it in that manner. The stone was thus lowered about a yard or so; but the man himself is said never to have done a day’s work afterwards; and to have died very shortly. Immediately after that was done, it is said that great reverses happened to the family, and they lost much of their property.

Now there was a dun cow in the fields about the Hall, quite wild, and looked upon as common property by the villagers. She was most famous for her milking qualities; and it was said that [she] let the people bring whatever number of pails they chose, she never sent any away empty. Truly, a most wonderful dun cow! An old witch, however, who lived in the neighbourhood, determined to see if the milk was really unlimited in quantity. She therefore took a riddle or sieve, and milked the poor cow into this; which, as it never filled, in time milked her dry. Hereupon she went mad immediately, and ran away in the direction of the stone, on which she trod, sinking it deeper in the earth, and leaving her mark upon it. This seemed to be the climax, for very shortly after this event, the family were obliged to leave the neighbourhood. I cannot learn what became of the witch after this mischievous action.
W. A. L.
This from Lancastrensis, in The Athenaeum 992 (Oct 31, 1846): 1116-1117.
Little Onn Hall was only built 1870s (by the Crockett family) but there must have been a house there before - or maybe it was one of the other buildings here. Which makes the site of the stone a bit difficult to work out.
Rhiannon Posted by Rhiannon
27th February 2012ce

Milford Round Barrow (Round Barrow(s)) — Fieldnotes

Just realized this is where Ih Hearg (my Heathen group) does it's ceremonies XD sunbird Posted by sunbird
22nd February 2012ce

Ramshorn Farm (Cup and Ring Marks / Rock Art) — Miscellaneous

The second stone mentioned in previous misc. post has now been donated to Leek Museum and is on display. stubob Posted by stubob
13th January 2012ce

Long Low (Bank Barrow) — Fieldnotes

Long low wasn't easy to find, in fact it would be fair to say we were going round in circles, unlike my first visit years ago when I had no problems locating it, but back then I was on my own and able to concentrate and tap into my site radar.

Eventually I was on the right road, even then its not much of a road, I could see it down the hill as I came over the crest, I was a tad naughty but I went all the way down and parked on farm property, right next to the southern barrow, but as the farm is out of site a quick hour was gotten away with.

From the other notes it seems we don't really know what to make of Long low, It has two barrows some distance away from each other and linked together by a long linear earthwork. The whole thing is a bit battered and abused, the cistern tank on the southern barrow is most annoying. Perhaps the occupants of the barrows were considered of such close kin as to be permanently and physically linked together.
Probably all too simple and just plain wrong, but as its such a singular construction one is forced to come up with some reason for it.
postman Posted by postman
16th October 2011ce

Wetton Low (Cairn(s)) — Images (click to view fullsize)

<b>Wetton Low</b>Posted by postman<b>Wetton Low</b>Posted by postman postman Posted by postman
16th October 2011ce

Long Low (Bank Barrow) — Images

<b>Long Low</b>Posted by postman<b>Long Low</b>Posted by postman postman Posted by postman
16th October 2011ce
Showing 1-10 of 253 posts. Most recent first | Next 10