Shall I remove clickhimin? it dates to 500BC and has attracted the following comment:
"note that (as the reporter points out in 'fieldnotes') the site at Clickimin doesn't relate to the pre-historic / neolithic period this web site really concerns itself with. nevertheless it is worth seeing if yr there"
May I ask for clarification as to the timescales that TMA concerns itself with? Are we saying no Iron Age at all?
McGrail - could you change brock to broch?
 Reply | with quote | Posted by BrigantesNation
5th February 2003ce
18:26 |
500BC too young for TMA? and McGrail (BrigantesNation, Feb 05, 2003, 18:26) |
|
Head To Head 
Top of page