thesweetcheat wrote:
Seriously though, how has this escaped everyone's notice before!?
The Ordnance Survey has marked it as a physical feature. It is marked by a black circle-ish shape in the field. Not identified as a "Stone Circle" though.
https://binged.it/2LkJesN
That black circle feature has appeared on the OS post-1967. The patch of rough ground where the circle lies (within the improved field) is shown as a seperate enclosed marshy area on the OS 25 Inch 1897-1914 sheet.
https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explor[...]on=-2.7983&layers=168&b=1&r=24
Reply | with quote | Posted by Howburn Digger 16th December 2018ce 20:07 |
Newly identified recumbent stone circle (thelonious, Dec 13, 2018, 14:32)- Re: Newly identified recumbent stone circle (thelonious, Dec 13, 2018, 14:51)
- Re: Newly identified recumbent stone circle (Howburn Digger, Dec 13, 2018, 17:05)
- Re: Newly identified recumbent stone circle (GLADMAN, Dec 15, 2018, 10:41)
- Re: Newly identified recumbent stone circle (drewbhoy, Dec 15, 2018, 17:39)
- nope (juamei, Jan 21, 2019, 14:49)
- Re: nope (treehugger-uk, Jan 21, 2019, 16:17)
- Re: nope (nigelswift, Jan 21, 2019, 16:20)
- Re: nope (drewbhoy, Jan 22, 2019, 00:23)
- Re: nope (nigelswift, Jan 22, 2019, 09:55)
- Re: nope (drewbhoy, Jan 22, 2019, 11:32)
- Re: nope (nigelswift, Jan 22, 2019, 12:05)
- Re: nope (drewbhoy, Jan 22, 2019, 12:27)
- Re: nope (thelonious, Jan 22, 2019, 12:52)
- Re: nope (drewbhoy, Jan 22, 2019, 12:59)
- Re: nope (ryaner, Jan 22, 2019, 18:40)
- Re: nope (nigelswift, Jan 23, 2019, 05:31)
- Re: nope (goffik, Jan 23, 2019, 09:52)
- Re: Newly identified recumbent stone circle (costaexpress, Jan 25, 2019, 12:51)
|
|