|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian Uffington White Horse Forum | Start a topic | Search |
108 messages | Select a forum: |
tiompan wrote: tjj wrote: I used the word to describe the whole tone of the thread. It hasn't really been a discussion but a dismissive dismantling of a piece of work done by an archaeologist who is otherwise respected. There was a lot of posts in the thread and what looked like a lot of discussion . I quoted comments to highlight the errors within them , I don't think that is unfair or even dogmatic . tjj wrote: I don't agree or disagree with the theory as don't have the astronomical software at my disposal (or the understanding) to do so. [/quote] You don't need any , I certainly didn't use any to be aware of and highlight the problems . tjj wrote: Generally speaking I'm a fan of logic but there are other elements to which logic cannot always be applied. We have often talked on this forum about how certain sites induce a feeling of well being and/or inexplicable euphoria - perhaps just the effort and sense of achievement of getting there, or a particularly blue sky, or the appearance of a rare bird. Just something not always easily put That doesn't apply to the contents of the article or what could be considered a scientific paper , it was in "Nature" which is not usually given to printing the type of stuff you describe . [quote=" [/quote] Same here . Thank you for your courteous reply. I'm not pleased Evergreen has chosen to stop posting. Between you, you present a logical discourse but this one felt as though it went on too long and was too one sided to be helpful. No offence intended to either of you. Reply | with quote |  20th August 2017ce 00:10 In reply to: Re: uffington horse and the sun (tiompan) |
Messages in this topic: |
|