nigelswift wrote: Well, as as Prof David Gill has asked: "by how much it would have to be "wrong" to make the figures acceptable."
I think everyone here knows you won't answer that, and why.
Watch, everyone....
Why not? Did I not make a valid point and you are using other peoples statistics to create a false claim.
Get real Nigel - NOBODY can realistically come up with a figure at all unless EVERY find is observed. Come back and tell us when they are okay.
I don't think I need to say any more now following this. We agree on the thieving being wrong, just at odds over the actual amount.
Now where's that threepenny bit - I must clean it up and put it on Ebay :-)
Reply | with quote | Posted by Sanctuary 3rd February 2018ce 10:24 |
Detectorists (Sanctuary, May 16, 2017, 09:33)- Re: Detectorists (Sanctuary, May 16, 2017, 09:44)
- Re: Detectorists (tjj, May 17, 2017, 13:47)
- Re: Detectorists (Sanctuary, Jun 05, 2017, 12:44)
- Detectorists (Sanctuary, Oct 31, 2017, 17:04)
- Re: Detectorists (moss, Dec 13, 2017, 13:03)
- Re: Detectorists (costaexpress, Dec 21, 2017, 16:49)
- Re: Detectorists Petition (Sanctuary, Jan 20, 2018, 12:15)
- Re: Detectorists (Sanctuary, Feb 20, 2018, 13:20)
|
|