tjj wrote:
I would just say to all the people who participated in this discussion and who cannot envisage less traffic filled roads - please stop going on about hiding the A303 from sight - a tunnel would have a massive impact on the Stonehenge environment and hey! if cars and lorries are so essential to our existence then they should be revered as they hurtle past Stonehenge, not hidden away. And could the same people stop moaning about wind turbines that can be seen from an ancient sites and solar panel parks that may catch our eye glinting in the sun as we drive past. The Piper must be paid.
Do we really have to divide up into opposing camps? I thought there was a high level of agreement on this thread. It seems like we'd all like to see less traffic on the roads. There's been some healthy, polite and respectful dialogue about whether and how we can achieve that.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Mustard 4th October 2013ce 09:09 |
A303 to go into a tunnel eventually? (Littlestone, Sep 26, 2013, 16:17)- Re: A303 to go into a tunnel eventually? (nix, Sep 27, 2013, 00:27)
- Re: A303 to go into a tunnel eventually? (tomwatts, Sep 27, 2013, 07:06)
- Re: A303 to go into a tunnel eventually? (Littlestone, Sep 27, 2013, 08:58)
- Re: A303 to go into a tunnel eventually? (nigelswift, Sep 30, 2013, 08:22)
- Re: A303 to go into a tunnel eventually? (Sanctuary, Sep 30, 2013, 09:36)
- Re: A303 to go into a tunnel eventually? (Sanctuary, Oct 04, 2013, 08:10)
|
|