The 1824 report says the capstone was resting on 5 uprights, so presumably the backstone (whether original or not) was one of them.
It still seems that the current set-up could be reached by shifts and falls over millennia (partly while under cover/semi-cover of a mound). Then you don't need a theory of major re-arrangement to get the shape we have now.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by thesweetcheat
2nd April 2013ce
19:04 |
Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (Sanctuary, Mar 29, 2013, 15:00)- Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (bladup, Mar 29, 2013, 15:17)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (harestonesdown, Mar 29, 2013, 18:22)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (Littlestone, Mar 30, 2013, 11:57)
- Similarities elsewhere? (juamei, Apr 01, 2013, 09:03)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (Sanctuary, Apr 01, 2013, 09:27)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (nigelswift, Apr 01, 2013, 10:13)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (juamei, Apr 01, 2013, 11:04)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (Littlestone, Apr 01, 2013, 13:32)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (Sanctuary, Apr 01, 2013, 13:57)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (harestonesdown, Apr 01, 2013, 14:05)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (Littlestone, Apr 01, 2013, 14:17)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (Rhiannon, Apr 01, 2013, 14:58)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (bladup, Apr 01, 2013, 17:22)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (bladup, Apr 01, 2013, 16:30)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (Harryshill, Apr 02, 2013, 21:18)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (bladup, Apr 03, 2013, 11:58)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Similarities elsewhere? (bladup)