nigelswift wrote:
If you: well, pointing out SH is unique in order to illustrate that lack of precedents don't invalidate your theory is a totally valid thing to say.
A lack of precedents doesn't necessarily invalidate a theory but when that precedent also involves negating the most obvious and simpler explanation it does make it much less likely .
 Reply | with quote | Posted by tiompan
1st April 2013ce
11:24 |
Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (Sanctuary, Mar 29, 2013, 15:00)- Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (bladup, Mar 29, 2013, 15:17)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (harestonesdown, Mar 29, 2013, 18:22)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (Littlestone, Mar 30, 2013, 11:57)
- Similarities elsewhere? (juamei, Apr 01, 2013, 09:03)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (Sanctuary, Apr 01, 2013, 09:27)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (nigelswift, Apr 01, 2013, 10:13)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (juamei, Apr 01, 2013, 11:04)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (Littlestone, Apr 01, 2013, 13:32)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (Sanctuary, Apr 01, 2013, 13:57)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (harestonesdown, Apr 01, 2013, 14:05)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (Littlestone, Apr 01, 2013, 14:17)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (Rhiannon, Apr 01, 2013, 14:58)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (bladup, Apr 01, 2013, 17:22)
- Re: Similarities elsewhere? (bladup, Apr 01, 2013, 16:30)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (Harryshill, Apr 02, 2013, 21:18)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece (bladup, Apr 03, 2013, 11:58)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Similarities elsewhere? (nigelswift)