Sanctuary wrote: harestonesdow wrote:
lol. then it's either the back stone of a capstone. 3 & 6 rear flankers, 4 the back stone. But i can't make any of the other stones fit as forward flankers. in the "correct" orientation could 2 pair up with 5 ?
I'm beginning to lose my mind now going through all these permutations, there's too many to make sense of, especially without all the measurements. . :)
Leave the measurements to me. You're getting there just move on now. No more clues :-)
I'm happy to leave it now and wait for the unveiling as my brain is fooked thinking about this solidly the last 2 days. Time for a lager. :)
Reply | with quote | Posted by harestonesdown 9th March 2013ce 23:00 |
Trethevy Quoit in danger (Sanctuary, Feb 27, 2013, 18:29)- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (tjj, Feb 27, 2013, 19:01)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (Squid Tempest, Feb 27, 2013, 19:16)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (thesweetcheat, Feb 27, 2013, 19:33)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (Littlestone, Feb 28, 2013, 10:36)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger/Nigel (Sanctuary, Mar 05, 2013, 13:58)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger/Dymond Ground Plan (Sanctuary, Mar 06, 2013, 10:18)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (The Heritage Trust, Mar 08, 2013, 15:57)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (harestonesdown, Mar 08, 2013, 16:12)
- OT (juamei, Mar 08, 2013, 17:51)
- Re: OT (nigelswift, Mar 08, 2013, 17:58)
- Re: OT (juamei, Mar 08, 2013, 18:03)
- Re: OT (harestonesdown, Mar 08, 2013, 17:59)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (bladup, Mar 08, 2013, 16:29)
|
|