|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian General Discussion Forum | Start a topic | Search |
 Re: Just messing. 433 messages | Select a forum: |
Sanctuary wrote: tiompan wrote: It is yet another complicating factor in an already unnecessarily complex sequence . How do you know it was unnecessary on this occasion George? It would't be here now but for that 'complex sequence' taking place. Again you are basing this on what has gone before and falling into the same trap as I did. There IS a first time for everything. It's the sequence that is unecessary ,if something had gone wrong and it was attempted to fix it then why involve four structural stones when all that would have been needed was to introduce an external stone ? I have avoided the "first time for everything " but as it keeps reappearing ,yes there certainly is a first time for any series of events that we can be sure of , but when that "first time " is the only time and there is an alternative much simpler explanation ,then that possible first time is much less likely . Reply | with quote |  9th March 2013ce 11:32 In reply to: Re: Just messing. (Sanctuary) |
Messages in this topic: |
|