nigelswift wrote: OK, I get the message!
But going back to the stability issue, if you're concerned that the EH engineer needs to reconsider maybe your best bet is to get a friendly structural engineer to contact him?
I wasn't being intentionally awkward Nigel but I'd like to keep some things back for obvious reasons. As it is I'm making it sound like a book sell but the fact is it's come at the time the quoit has come under threat and it was important to mention it as this situation goes on all over the shop!
Re the engineer, yes a good idea, but I don't have or know any friendly ones. It was pointed out to me that EH engineers are highly skilled, far more than your bog standard engineer because they are used to seeing really dodgy archaeoligical structures that seem to defy all logic and almost won't fall so they tend not to overeact.
So there! :-)
Reply | with quote | Posted by Sanctuary 2nd March 2013ce 22:52 |
Trethevy Quoit in danger (Sanctuary, Feb 27, 2013, 18:29)- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (tjj, Feb 27, 2013, 19:01)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (Squid Tempest, Feb 27, 2013, 19:16)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (thesweetcheat, Feb 27, 2013, 19:33)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (Littlestone, Feb 28, 2013, 10:36)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger/Nigel (Sanctuary, Mar 05, 2013, 13:58)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger/Dymond Ground Plan (Sanctuary, Mar 06, 2013, 10:18)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (The Heritage Trust, Mar 08, 2013, 15:57)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (harestonesdown, Mar 08, 2013, 16:12)
- OT (juamei, Mar 08, 2013, 17:51)
- Re: OT (nigelswift, Mar 08, 2013, 17:58)
- Re: OT (juamei, Mar 08, 2013, 18:03)
- Re: OT (harestonesdown, Mar 08, 2013, 17:59)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (bladup, Mar 08, 2013, 16:29)
|
|