The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian
Home Latest Posts Forums Maps Help
Browse Sites News Blog Contributors The Books
Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Avebury Forum Start a topic | Search
Avebury
Re: In summary...
761 messages
Select a forum:
harestonesdown wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
bladup wrote:
harestonesdown wrote:
bladup wrote:
Mustard wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
Mustard wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
Keep dreaming.

Would it hurt you to just be POLITE??? You don't want the stones re-erected - fine. That's your right, to hold that opinion and to argue for it. But there's no need to be so bloody rude to people who hold a different view.


If you wasn't so bloody rude yourself you might understand that others weren't. Pot calling the kettle black !!!


Rubbish. Bladup made a perfectly civil and positive post. You disagree with re-erection - fine. You've already established this. So why did you need to respond with a mean-spirited and dismissive comment that added absolutely nothing to his post?


Thank you Mustard, we know how he feels about it, i respect that, but not the fact he keeeeeeeeeeeeps saying it, this is just negative bollocks.



Can we please keep it civil ?
I know that's a bit "ripe" coming from me but there's really no need for expletives and such, they add nothing. :)


You do know he's breaking up the discussion on purpose though, we know, understand and respect his opinion, what more can we do, all he's doing is throwing a spanner in the works, and it's on purpose, we are allowed to dream, you know my real name, i know yours, who is he? why hide behind a name when he openly admits to never visiting anywhere anymore, he's never gonna see any of us, he's a troublemaker who just goes against people on everything, it's nothing to do with strongly held beliefs or anything like that, because he's always against everything.


That is just shit stirring. Had it ever occurred to you that visiting was no longer a viable option. Of course I would love to get out more.



But he has a relevant point in that everyone else here knows the others who are contributing. Some might dismiss you as no more than a troll in such circumstances.


He is, go on "Harryshill" admit it your just a classic troublemaking troll, you are against the restoring of any stones but it's not about that, because so are Nigel and Rhiannon but no one has an issue with them on the subject, fishy, very fishy.


Reply | with quote
bladup
Posted by bladup
23rd January 2013ce
22:18

In reply to:

Re: In summary... (harestonesdown)

Messages in this topic:

Terms & Conditions  |  Home  |  Julian Cope presents Head Heritage Top of page