bladup wrote: tiompan wrote: bladup wrote: nigelswift wrote: I just meant your experience at the site is adequate for you but is of no value to anyone else who is trying to work out what happened there.
Why not? i would be interested if it was someone else.
In this field subjective impressions usually tell us more about the person , their culture and period they live in than the object being experienced .
But boy i have a lot of objects, that is the proof-----real items, beautiful items, not something in my head [i get shown it, i don't even look!!], i'm to busy looking at the landscapes, people may be able to use metal detectors for metal, but theres nothing like that for what i end up with.
People find objects all the time , it doesn't mean they have been led to them , although some may believe so from a religio/mystico perspective .Those who find things without that perspective put it down to hard work ,being in the right place ,study , having an understanding of where to expect to find these things , luck and other unconscious motivations that could be subsumed under intuition , which is in effect knowing without knowing , the norm of everyday consciousness .
Reply | with quote | Posted by tiompan 6th August 2012ce 09:12 |
Modern not antiquarian (texlahoma, Aug 01, 2012, 11:49)- Re: Modern not antiquarian (Littlestone, Aug 01, 2012, 12:15)
- Re: Modern not antiquarian (goffik, Aug 01, 2012, 12:59)
- Re: Modern not antiquarian (Chris Collyer, Aug 01, 2012, 13:18)
- Re: Modern not antiquarian (CARL, Aug 01, 2012, 13:45)
- OT: That's you! OMG! (thesweetcheat, Aug 01, 2012, 21:24)
|
|