The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian

Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Slaggyford Stones Forum Start a topic | Search
Slaggyford Stones
Re: Slaggyford Stones .
170 messages
Select a forum:
thesweetcheat wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
Jim takes the view that the original concept of the hill did not have a construction blueprint to take it though to completion 100 + into the future prior to work starting but that doesn't mean there was no bluprint in mind as to how high it would reach or what its intention was. That of course is unprovable but obviously as it progressed each stage would have been carefully thought out and have a 'blueprint' of its own. See it as the building of a block of flats with each storey being built by a different gang but decided beforehand exactly how many stories there would be in total to reach a certain height. Before each gang begins work they get together and discuss how they will go about it and is it to be any different to the lower stories. A individual construction 'blueprint' is decided upon for that storey and they get on with it, but all the while with the initial blueprint in mind.


A possible - albeit much more recent - analogy might be the building of a medieval church or cathedral. Building starts in 1100 using available technology - thick walls, rounded arches and the building is planned on that basis. Then, 50 years later, technology improves and so the next part is built using higher, pointed arches, and then flying buttresses allow the weight to be distributed more cleverly, glass technology improves as well and and thinner framed, larger windows let in more light. Perhaps a spire is added. Each stage is planned - to completion of the whole buidling, not just to the completion of one corner. But the design changes, often before build, as technology advances or perhaps more money becomes available (for instance because your church is in area where the wool trade has taken off). None of it means that the original plan wasn't complete in its own right, just that things changed. That would seem a plausible supposition for Silbury, regardless of whether it can be definitively "proven".


Yes a good point TSC and well put over. Quite how much 'advancement' in building techniques there would be back then we can only guess at. Technology moves on so quickly today but would it have been the same then I wonder?


Reply | with quote
Posted by Sanctuary
11th September 2011ce
20:34

In reply to:

Re: Slaggyford Stones . (thesweetcheat)

1 reply:

Re: Slaggyford Stones . (thesweetcheat)

Messages in this topic: