StoneGloves wrote: "As for what if anything it's meant to represent, that's unlikely to be figured out"
It's a circular argument - but Silbury Hill, now, is (roughly) the shape of upturned iside-out cupmark. I doubt it's a coincidence. There is a naturally occurring fossil that is the exactly same shape. An inch, an inch and a half across, in sandstone.
Silbury Hill is very big, so that would be a very big cup mark and if a fossil is exactly the same shape then it would be bigger than an inch and a half. Maybe Silbury has shrank since the last time I visited.
Reply | with quote | Posted by drewbhoy 10th September 2011ce 22:28 |
Slaggyford Stones . (tiompan, Sep 04, 2011, 18:38)- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (Sanctuary, Sep 09, 2011, 07:09)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (StoneGloves, Sep 09, 2011, 11:04)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (tiompan, Sep 09, 2011, 11:51)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (StoneGloves, Sep 09, 2011, 12:46)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (tiompan, Sep 09, 2011, 13:28)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (tiompan, Sep 09, 2011, 16:47)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (StoneGloves, Sep 09, 2011, 19:44)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (tiompan, Sep 09, 2011, 19:58)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (StoneGloves, Sep 10, 2011, 05:54)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (tiompan, Sep 10, 2011, 09:06)
- Replay x436 (StoneGloves, Sep 10, 2011, 10:23)
- Re: Replay x436 (tiompan, Sep 10, 2011, 11:18)
- Re: Replay x436 (StoneGloves, Sep 10, 2011, 12:50)
- Re: Replay x436 (tiompan, Sep 10, 2011, 13:16)
- Replay 436 (StoneGloves, Sep 10, 2011, 13:36)
- Re: Replay 436 (tiompan, Sep 10, 2011, 13:50)
- Re: (StoneGloves, Sep 10, 2011, 14:03)
- Re: (tiompan, Sep 10, 2011, 14:18)
- Re: (StoneGloves, Sep 10, 2011, 14:35)
- Re: (StoneGloves, Sep 10, 2011, 14:40)
- Re: (tiompan, Sep 10, 2011, 14:47)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (Howburn Digger, Sep 12, 2011, 14:58)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (blossom, Sep 12, 2011, 20:57)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (Littlestone, Sep 10, 2011, 15:30)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (tiompan, Sep 10, 2011, 15:50)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (Sanctuary, Sep 10, 2011, 16:18)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (Littlestone, Sep 10, 2011, 17:56)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (Littlestone, Sep 10, 2011, 18:18)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (tiompan, Sep 10, 2011, 18:42)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (Littlestone, Sep 10, 2011, 19:10)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2011, 19:12)
- Re: Slag (StoneGloves, Sep 10, 2011, 20:31)
- Re: Slag (drewbhoy, Sep 10, 2011, 22:28)
- Slaggy (StoneGloves, Sep 11, 2011, 06:47)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (Sanctuary, Sep 10, 2011, 21:37)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (tiompan, Sep 10, 2011, 16:38)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (StoneGloves, Sep 10, 2011, 18:49)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (Sanctuary, Sep 11, 2011, 10:00)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (Resonox, Sep 12, 2011, 05:19)
- Re: Slaggyford Stones . (tiompan, Sep 12, 2011, 08:32)
- My precious finds ... (StoneGloves, Sep 12, 2011, 08:33)
- Re: My precious finds ... (Sanctuary, Sep 12, 2011, 08:43)
- Re: My precious finds ... (tiompan, Sep 12, 2011, 08:47)
- Re: My precious finds ... (StoneGloves, Sep 12, 2011, 13:26)
- Re: My precious finds ... (tiompan, Sep 12, 2011, 13:53)
- My precious stones ... (StoneGloves, Sep 12, 2011, 15:57)
- Precious stones ... (StoneGloves, Sep 12, 2011, 16:23)
- Re: My precious stones ... (tiompan, Sep 12, 2011, 16:26)
- The precious stones ... (StoneGloves, Sep 12, 2011, 16:41)
- Re: The precious stones ... (tiompan, Sep 12, 2011, 16:49)
- Re: The precious stones ... (StoneGloves, Sep 12, 2011, 17:17)
- Re: The precious stones ... (tiompan, Sep 12, 2011, 17:33)
- Re: The precious stones ... (StoneGloves, Sep 12, 2011, 18:05)
- Re: The precious stones ... (tiompan, Sep 12, 2011, 18:27)
- Re: The precious stones ... (StoneGloves, Sep 12, 2011, 19:56)
- Re: The precious stones ... (StoneGloves, Sep 13, 2011, 08:36)
- Veni, Vide, Nil Vici (StoneGloves, Sep 13, 2011, 21:20)
- Re: My precious stones ... (Sanctuary, Sep 12, 2011, 16:47)
- Re: My precious finds ... (juamei, Sep 12, 2011, 20:45)
|
|