Hot on the heels of the IPPCC summary last week saying thre's no discernable human influence in observational climate data (that's right, they've said it - with the usual bullshit caveats - perhaps in 30 years, etc), there's been another 'climate-gate' style email leak.
Here it is, hopefully people will start to see what a fucking sham this Global Warming garbage is!
http://tallbloke.wordpress.com[...]ng-news-foia-2011-has-arrived/
Serisouly, just go read some of the shenanigans and data-manipulation.
Just a taste:
I too don’t see why the schemes should be symmetrical. The temperature ones
certainly will not as we’re choosing the periods to show warming.
Trenberth:
Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical
troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a
wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the
uncertainty and be honest. Phil, hopefully we can find time to discuss these
further if necessary [...]
Thorne:
I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it
which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run.
Carter:
 Reply | with quote | Posted by jshell
22nd November 2011ce
15:13 |
Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Mar 11, 2011, 09:42)- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (BigSweetie, Mar 11, 2011, 13:50)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Littlestone, Mar 13, 2011, 15:32)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thelonious, Mar 15, 2011, 17:05)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Resonox, Mar 15, 2011, 18:43)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Mar 15, 2011, 18:59)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thelonious, Mar 15, 2011, 19:41)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thelonious, Nov 15, 2011, 12:25)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Nov 16, 2011, 11:27)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (goffik, Nov 16, 2011, 12:53)
- OT: Government's attitude to green energy (thesweetcheat, Nov 16, 2011, 18:17)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 17, 2011, 11:55)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (tjj, Nov 17, 2011, 14:09)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (thesweetcheat, Nov 17, 2011, 17:11)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (GLADMAN, Nov 18, 2011, 23:48)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (Sanctuary, Nov 19, 2011, 07:14)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (moss, Nov 19, 2011, 10:56)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 19, 2011, 12:06)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 13:34)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (PMM, Nov 23, 2011, 14:00)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (juamei, Nov 23, 2011, 15:17)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 16:34)
- Some Glacial Science.... (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 16:51)
- Why we believe glaciers melt due to climate change..... (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 18:00)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (PMM, Nov 24, 2011, 16:39)
- Fuck It! Another Climate-Gate Style Leak... (jshell, Nov 22, 2011, 15:13)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (drewbhoy, Mar 15, 2011, 20:43)
- Re; Caithness area (moss, Mar 18, 2011, 08:40)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Littlestone, Mar 18, 2011, 11:18)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Sanctuary, Nov 20, 2011, 09:19)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Howburn Digger, Jan 19, 2012, 20:09)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (juamei, Jan 19, 2012, 21:21)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thesweetcheat, Jan 19, 2012, 21:25)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (drewbhoy, Jan 19, 2012, 23:06)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Jan 20, 2012, 10:21)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (goffik, Jan 27, 2012, 17:02)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell)