tjj wrote: I was talking about aesthetics rather than the technicalities of getting the power produced into the National Grid.
Aesthetics are out the window when it comes to the technicalities....unfortunately beauty(and history) will take a back seat . There would be no point at all in putting up windfarms/solar panels/wave turbines/hydro-electric dams without the wherewithal to use them.
tjj wrote: That aside, with what is happening in Japan at present, the argument against nuclear energy is ever stronger; wind farms, hydro-electric schemes, solar panels, tide/wave schemes are the only viable alternative for the production of energy in the future. I guess we are going to have to work with Nature rather than against it.
All of the above would have been destroyed in the tragedy and caused havoc(arguably with less possibilty of radiaton contamination), the destruction of electricity cables and gas mains have been the major source of the fires. Tidal turbine floats for example, if they were built on the scale required, would have been washed inshore and smashed people and buildings adding to the destruction and death toll.
I seriously doubt anyone is working against nature, but even if they are nature, will destroy any and all efforts to work with it with an equal indiscrimination.
Some friends of mine in Japan have been in touch and are safe though at least two have lost relatives.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Resonox 14th March 2011ce 06:53 |
Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Mar 11, 2011, 09:42)- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (BigSweetie, Mar 11, 2011, 13:50)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Littlestone, Mar 13, 2011, 15:32)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thelonious, Mar 15, 2011, 17:05)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Resonox, Mar 15, 2011, 18:43)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Mar 15, 2011, 18:59)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thelonious, Mar 15, 2011, 19:41)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thelonious, Nov 15, 2011, 12:25)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Nov 16, 2011, 11:27)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (goffik, Nov 16, 2011, 12:53)
- OT: Government's attitude to green energy (thesweetcheat, Nov 16, 2011, 18:17)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 17, 2011, 11:55)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (tjj, Nov 17, 2011, 14:09)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (thesweetcheat, Nov 17, 2011, 17:11)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (GLADMAN, Nov 18, 2011, 23:48)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (Sanctuary, Nov 19, 2011, 07:14)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (moss, Nov 19, 2011, 10:56)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 19, 2011, 12:06)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 13:34)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (PMM, Nov 23, 2011, 14:00)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (juamei, Nov 23, 2011, 15:17)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 16:34)
- Some Glacial Science.... (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 16:51)
- Why we believe glaciers melt due to climate change..... (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 18:00)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (PMM, Nov 24, 2011, 16:39)
- Fuck It! Another Climate-Gate Style Leak... (jshell, Nov 22, 2011, 15:13)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (drewbhoy, Mar 15, 2011, 20:43)
- Re; Caithness area (moss, Mar 18, 2011, 08:40)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Littlestone, Mar 18, 2011, 11:18)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Sanctuary, Nov 20, 2011, 09:19)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Howburn Digger, Jan 19, 2012, 20:09)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (juamei, Jan 19, 2012, 21:21)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thesweetcheat, Jan 19, 2012, 21:25)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (drewbhoy, Jan 19, 2012, 23:06)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Jan 20, 2012, 10:21)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (goffik, Jan 27, 2012, 17:02)
|
|