tiompan wrote: Resonox wrote: I suppose certain things might be disregarded ...because of seeming insignificance....if the surveyors are looking for largish stones or constructs.
In the case of rock art they just don't notice it unless it is obvious and if it is under turf then they shouldn't be expeceted to deal with that .
The thing is, most stones seem like nothing to most people. My family (for example) can appreciate photos of Stonehenge or Avebury, but when I show them Mitchells Fold or Doll Tor they think I'm a bit mad, "Some tiny stones? I've got some of them in the garden if you wanna take some photos!"
Rock art is just as hard. We have all spent at least one day on a hillside with a map wondering round in circles saying "where the bloody hell is it?!" so even the more experienced of us know that its hard to account for everything!
Besides, I like wind farms. I think they look amazing and are necessary.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by faerygirl
12th March 2011ce
21:10 |
Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Mar 11, 2011, 09:42)- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (BigSweetie, Mar 11, 2011, 13:50)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Littlestone, Mar 13, 2011, 15:32)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thelonious, Mar 15, 2011, 17:05)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Resonox, Mar 15, 2011, 18:43)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Mar 15, 2011, 18:59)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thelonious, Mar 15, 2011, 19:41)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thelonious, Nov 15, 2011, 12:25)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Nov 16, 2011, 11:27)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (goffik, Nov 16, 2011, 12:53)
- OT: Government's attitude to green energy (thesweetcheat, Nov 16, 2011, 18:17)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 17, 2011, 11:55)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (tjj, Nov 17, 2011, 14:09)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (thesweetcheat, Nov 17, 2011, 17:11)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (GLADMAN, Nov 18, 2011, 23:48)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (Sanctuary, Nov 19, 2011, 07:14)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (moss, Nov 19, 2011, 10:56)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 19, 2011, 12:06)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 13:34)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (PMM, Nov 23, 2011, 14:00)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (juamei, Nov 23, 2011, 15:17)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 16:34)
- Some Glacial Science.... (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 16:51)
- Why we believe glaciers melt due to climate change..... (jshell, Nov 23, 2011, 18:00)
- Re: OT: Government's attitude to green energy (PMM, Nov 24, 2011, 16:39)
- Fuck It! Another Climate-Gate Style Leak... (jshell, Nov 22, 2011, 15:13)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (drewbhoy, Mar 15, 2011, 20:43)
- Re; Caithness area (moss, Mar 18, 2011, 08:40)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Littlestone, Mar 18, 2011, 11:18)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Sanctuary, Nov 20, 2011, 09:19)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (Howburn Digger, Jan 19, 2012, 20:09)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (juamei, Jan 19, 2012, 21:21)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (thesweetcheat, Jan 19, 2012, 21:25)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (drewbhoy, Jan 19, 2012, 23:06)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (moss, Jan 20, 2012, 10:21)
- Re: Wind farms in Scotland (goffik, Jan 27, 2012, 17:02)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Wind farms in Scotland (tiompan)