tiompan wrote:
The constellation stuff is attributable to nameless "astronomers " TJJ and that is the bigger mistake as it is refutable . If archaeologists accept what they say in relation to the slightly more technical aspect and ignore the obvious i.e. you could find anything among these points/cups plus a history of similar failed attempts then thats their problem .The ritual way marker is just conjecture as you say , you could discuss it forever it's just a matter of opinion but it's not really in the same league as ordered architecture like avenues ,passages and entrances , it is after all a collapsed capstone not a standing stone .In it's original state it would have functioned to a greater extent as an ordering architectural feature .
Thanks Tiompan, a grounded response. Perhaps it will be read by the team putting forward the two 'may-bes'.
Edited:
Reply | with quote | Posted by tjj 3rd December 2010ce 23:31 |
Trefael..more may and maybe's (Sanctuary, Dec 03, 2010, 10:24)- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (tiompan, Dec 03, 2010, 10:34)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (tjj, Dec 03, 2010, 18:27)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (postman, Dec 03, 2010, 19:14)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (George Nash, Dec 06, 2010, 01:05)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (tjj, Dec 06, 2010, 08:32)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (Sanctuary, Dec 06, 2010, 09:10)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (tiompan, Dec 06, 2010, 10:05)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (George Nash, Dec 06, 2010, 15:49)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (tiompan, Dec 06, 2010, 16:10)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (Sanctuary, Dec 06, 2010, 16:11)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (George Nash, Dec 07, 2010, 14:26)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (moss, Dec 07, 2010, 14:48)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (Sanctuary, Dec 07, 2010, 15:25)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (tiompan, Dec 07, 2010, 19:41)
- Re: Trefael..more may and maybe's (Sanctuary, Dec 08, 2010, 10:26)
|
|