[quote="tiompan
Not sure what your'e suggesting .There are quite a lot of them . East Kennet being the most obvious . DNA and tooth enamel , if the chamber(s) was really secure like the recent results from Prisse La Chariere would be good but I think there is a chance that most arcaheologists would be happy to leave things as they are for future generations and technological advances .[/quote]
Not sure about the unwillingness of an archo to disturb the EKLB, I would have thought they'd be fighting over the chance to get stuck in there and make a name for themselves!
Reply | with quote | Posted by Sanctuary 6th September 2010ce 17:57 |
Houses for the dead...what about the living? (Sanctuary, Sep 06, 2010, 07:54)- Re: Houses for the dead...what about the living? (tiompan, Sep 06, 2010, 08:25)
- Re: Houses for the dead...what about the living? (faerygirl, Sep 06, 2010, 13:41)
- Re: Houses for the dead...what about the living? (BuckyE, Sep 07, 2010, 13:25)
- Re: Houses for the dead...what about the living? (Evergreen Dazed, Nov 21, 2017, 07:51)
|
|