Rhiannon wrote: yep reckon you're right. The photo's missing the gate I got through, curiously, that must be newer than I thought. But it does seem like it's on the boundary line.
Despite the visual impression on GE of the continuation of the boundary from the north , the 6 inch OS map of 1889 has similar boundaries to what is seen today and no mention of the stone . Noteworthy that the farmer has a left a bit of rough pasture around it and hasn't ploughed/seeded right around it .
 Reply | with quote | Posted by tiompan
27th July 2010ce
21:43 |
Please look at my stone (Rhiannon, Jul 27, 2010, 20:10)- Re: Please look at my stone (megadread, Jul 27, 2010, 20:12)
- Re: Please look at my stone (thesweetcheat, Jul 27, 2010, 20:15)
- Re: Please look at my stone (goffik, Jul 27, 2010, 20:16)
- Re: Please look at my stone (postman, Jul 27, 2010, 20:27)
- Re: Please look at my stone (tjj, Jul 27, 2010, 20:28)
- Re: Please look at my stone (Rhiannon, Jul 27, 2010, 20:29)
- Fin-shaped standing stone (StoneGloves, Jul 27, 2010, 20:33)
- Re: Please look at my stone (wideford, Jul 27, 2010, 21:18)
- Re: Please look at my stone (moss, Jul 27, 2010, 21:26)
- Re: Please look at my stone (Rhiannon, Aug 04, 2010, 13:01)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Please look at my stone (Rhiannon)