If this was actually leaked by someone then it's a shame to be sure, but... this article is so awful I can't help but wonder what was actually leaked. The graphics don't match what was actually in this year's trenches (even the avenue is a 'path'), and they haven't even got Mikes theory right (Woodhenge up there in the corner of the map). It almost sounds as if someone overheard a guy in a pub, phoned round a few archaeologists for some quotes and hotchpotched a story together. Half of it isn't even about the new henge.
 This topic is locked | Posted by Psychostevouk
3rd October 2009ce
19:46 |
bluehenge and a despicable leak (megadread, Oct 03, 2009, 01:55)- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (Deepinder Cheema, Oct 03, 2009, 03:39)
- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (Rhiannon, Oct 03, 2009, 09:05)
- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (dodge one, Oct 03, 2009, 16:21)
- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (Psychostevouk, Oct 03, 2009, 19:46)
- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (drewbhoy, Oct 04, 2009, 00:13)
- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (moss, Oct 04, 2009, 13:25)
|
|
Log in |
Register
Head To Head 
bluehenge and a despicable leak (megadread)