nigelswift wrote: Sorry, I don't think you've explained how the two are different, let alone vastly different, you've merely reiterated that they are.
I beg to differ. I think I explained it quite adequately.
nigelswift wrote: Until you do I'll have to continue to think they are similar.
No problem. Can't say I'll lose any sleep over it. But it would be nice if you could treat this as a conversation rather than an argument.
"Nor do you "own" an ancient site any more than the next person."
nigelswift wrote: Indeed. Which is why I used the term "joint stakeholder".
I'm not a "joint stakeholder" in my friend's house. Do we really need to waste our time discussing the merits/demerits of the analogy? Or shall we get back to the point at hand, that we pretty much seem to agree on anyway?
nigelswift wrote: We all own them in common and therefore we all owe one another a duty of care, courtesy and respect
I'm not disputing that. I simply said it was a poor analogy.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Mustard
1st July 2007ce
14:49 |
Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 25, 2007, 15:18)- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tiompan, Jun 25, 2007, 16:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Hob, Jun 25, 2007, 17:18)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 26, 2007, 11:26)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 26, 2007, 14:45)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 26, 2007, 23:14)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tomwatts, Jun 27, 2007, 14:57)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 27, 2007, 21:24)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (FourWinds, Jun 28, 2007, 05:51)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 28, 2007, 06:07)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (ocifant, Jun 28, 2007, 06:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tuesday, Jun 28, 2007, 08:41)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard, Jun 29, 2007, 18:04)
- New Code (nigelswift, Jun 28, 2007, 11:52)
- Re: New Code (Mustard, Jun 29, 2007, 18:05)
- Re: New Code (FourWinds, Jun 29, 2007, 19:24)
- Re: New Code (Mustard, Jun 29, 2007, 19:27)
- Re: New Code (FourWinds, Jun 30, 2007, 11:11)
- Re: New Code (Mustard, Jun 30, 2007, 13:22)
- Re: New Code (FourWinds, Jun 30, 2007, 13:51)
- Re: New Code (Mustard, Jun 30, 2007, 14:44)
- Re: New Code (slumpystones, Jun 30, 2007, 15:22)
- Re: New Code (CianMcLiam, Jun 30, 2007, 18:45)
- Re: New Code (Mustard, Jun 30, 2007, 20:31)
- Re: New Code (nigelswift, Jul 01, 2007, 10:35)
- Re: New Code (Mustard, Jul 01, 2007, 11:44)
- Re: New Code (nigelswift, Jul 01, 2007, 13:54)
- Re: New Code (Mustard, Jul 01, 2007, 14:49)
- Re: New Code (FourWinds, Jun 30, 2007, 19:29)
- Re: New Code (moss, Jun 30, 2007, 09:08)
- Re: New Code (BuckyE, Jun 29, 2007, 23:05)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 29, 2007, 15:27)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Vybik Jon, Sep 17, 2012, 14:26)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: New Code (nigelswift)