Oh brother! You guys. It's the old toilet seat argument again: does it get left up or down? (Meaning, of course, the girls want the seat left down, the boys want the seat left up, right?) Well, the OBVIOUS solution to that is to leave it the way the NEXT PERSON wants it. The girls leave the seat up for the boys, and vice versa.
Applying the same logic, the TMAers are hereby required to leave some piece of plastic tat every time they visit, for the worshippers and tourists to admire, and the pagans and tourists to clean it up, leaving the site clean for the old curmudgeons. Jeeze, wasn't that easy?
And a big hello to Mustard and Mirla! Fun place, huh?
Reply | with quote | Posted by BuckyE 29th June 2007ce 23:05 |
Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 25, 2007, 15:18)- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tiompan, Jun 25, 2007, 16:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Hob, Jun 25, 2007, 17:18)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 26, 2007, 11:26)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 26, 2007, 14:45)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 26, 2007, 23:14)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tomwatts, Jun 27, 2007, 14:57)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 27, 2007, 21:24)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (FourWinds, Jun 28, 2007, 05:51)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 28, 2007, 06:07)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (ocifant, Jun 28, 2007, 06:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tuesday, Jun 28, 2007, 08:41)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard, Jun 29, 2007, 18:04)
- New Code (nigelswift, Jun 28, 2007, 11:52)
- Re: New Code (Mustard, Jun 29, 2007, 18:05)
- Re: New Code (BuckyE, Jun 29, 2007, 23:05)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 29, 2007, 15:27)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Vybik Jon, Sep 17, 2012, 14:26)
|
|