Littlestone wrote: I'd say your reluctance to answer my question regarding which areas of the megalithic subject you're interested in, or have some degree of knowledge about, speaks for itself.
Time will tell however, and if you do have something to contribute to TMA, rather than just getting up people's noses, that should become apparent before long.
You're off again aren't you!? In all the years you've been on TMA, look at yourcontribution of sites to this website! A few ludicrously debatable rocks under churches and personal insults to those who disagree with you. Awesome mate!
Littlestone wrote: Meanwhile, I have more important things to do than engage with you here (my goldfish has a headache and needs an aspirin).
My sympathies are with the goldfish. The poor thing... No wonder it's gotta headache!
Reply | with quote | Posted by Paulus 27th June 2007ce 15:14 |
Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 25, 2007, 15:18)- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tiompan, Jun 25, 2007, 16:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Hob, Jun 25, 2007, 17:18)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 26, 2007, 11:26)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 26, 2007, 14:45)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 26, 2007, 23:14)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tomwatts, Jun 27, 2007, 14:57)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 27, 2007, 21:24)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (FourWinds, Jun 28, 2007, 05:51)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 28, 2007, 06:07)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (ocifant, Jun 28, 2007, 06:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tuesday, Jun 28, 2007, 08:41)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard, Jun 29, 2007, 18:04)
- New Code (nigelswift, Jun 28, 2007, 11:52)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 29, 2007, 15:27)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Vybik Jon, Sep 17, 2012, 14:26)
|
|