The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian
Home Latest Posts Forums Maps Help
Browse Sites News Blog Contributors The Books
Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   General Discussion Forum Start a topic | Search
The Modern Antiquarian
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use?
225 messages
Select a forum:
nigelswift wrote:
"not what most people, in my opinion, want to see at any SAM."

And that's the clincher.

If it was put to the vote it would come out "no littering in a public place thankyou" and no amount of looking in the dictionary would change it.


Tonbridge and Malling council made a big deal about roadside flowers for deceased pedestrians, claiming it was unsightly, messy, smelly, and non-perishable. The same rule should apply, with a little commonsense.


Reply | with quote
slumpystones
Posted by slumpystones
27th June 2007ce
14:02

In reply to:

Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (nigelswift)

1 reply:

Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard)

Messages in this topic:

Terms & Conditions  |  Home  |  Julian Cope presents Head Heritage Top of page