Littlestone wrote:
Brilliant! And brings us neatly back to English Heritage's nauseating idea of a 21st century time capsule buried in Silbury (just after they've finished 'conserving' it).
An admission that the guy they uphold as a shining figure, Mr Atkinson, brought the conservation about because he screwed the job badly the first time would be welcome too. The earlier tunnellers share some responsibility, but they were not in possession of the equipment and 20th century knowhow, and there was no evidence of any subsidence before 1969.
Reply | with quote | Posted by slumpystones 26th June 2007ce 18:49 |
Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 25, 2007, 15:18)- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tiompan, Jun 25, 2007, 16:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Hob, Jun 25, 2007, 17:18)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 26, 2007, 11:26)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 26, 2007, 14:45)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard, Jun 26, 2007, 14:48)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (ocifant, Jun 26, 2007, 14:56)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 26, 2007, 15:01)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard, Jun 26, 2007, 15:01)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 26, 2007, 15:07)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard, Jun 26, 2007, 15:15)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (ocifant, Jun 26, 2007, 16:06)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (CianMcLiam, Jun 26, 2007, 16:57)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Littlestone, Jun 26, 2007, 18:28)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (slumpystones, Jun 26, 2007, 18:49)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard, Jun 26, 2007, 19:10)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tuesday, Jun 26, 2007, 19:51)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tiompan, Jun 26, 2007, 17:11)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 26, 2007, 23:14)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tomwatts, Jun 27, 2007, 14:57)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 27, 2007, 21:24)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (FourWinds, Jun 28, 2007, 05:51)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 28, 2007, 06:07)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (ocifant, Jun 28, 2007, 06:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tuesday, Jun 28, 2007, 08:41)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard, Jun 29, 2007, 18:04)
- New Code (nigelswift, Jun 28, 2007, 11:52)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 29, 2007, 15:27)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Vybik Jon, Sep 17, 2012, 14:26)
|
|