"anyone who thinks that simply throwing more labour at the problem is the answer is simply wrong. As the labour force grows the efficiency of each man will decrease. (That is a fact and by as much as 50%) As will the efficiency of each man after just 5 mins of effort. (Another fact and if the effort is continued by as much as 100%). "
This is the crux. As you know, some of us concluded something quite different that day. In particular, that the exercise was hopelessly undermanned, hence any loss in individual efficiency as numbers were increased had a significant observable effect. Truth is though, individual declines in efficiency become irrelevant if there are enough people. 50-100% decreases in efficiency don't matter if you have 1000-2000% more people. If this was not true then a team of 50 in a tug 'o war wouldn't be always beaten by a team of 1000 without even raising a sweat.
For this reason some of us concluded that the lesson of the day wasn't that scaling up was impossible but that it was the only viable option. I know you postulate that a small team was used (and hence stonerowing had to be used) and quote Burl in support of the idea they wouldn't have many people available, but that was before the Durrington dig.
So I don't agree "Stone-rowing to date remains the only credible solution". "Lots of folks" seems much simpler and more certain.
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 18th November 2008ce 05:22 |
The bluestone debate (Littlestone, Jun 14, 2006, 10:57)- Re: The bluestone debate (Spaceship mark, Jun 14, 2006, 13:57)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Jun 15, 2006, 07:15)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Paulus, Jun 15, 2006, 12:30)
- Re: The bluestone debate (juamei, Jun 15, 2006, 12:39)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Littlestone, Jun 15, 2006, 16:01)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Pete G, Jun 15, 2006, 16:06)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Cursuswalker, Jun 17, 2006, 13:18)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Littlestone, Jun 17, 2006, 15:51)
- Re: The bluestone debate (The Eternal, Jun 17, 2006, 23:20)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Pete G, Jun 17, 2006, 23:28)
- And ... (FourWinds, Jun 18, 2006, 08:16)
- Also (StoneLifter, Jun 18, 2006, 09:57)
- Re: Also (nigelswift, Jun 18, 2006, 10:09)
- Re: Also (Steve Gray, Jun 20, 2006, 08:06)
- Re: Also (Littlestone, Jun 20, 2006, 10:15)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Cursuswalker, Jun 18, 2006, 08:22)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Littlestone, Jun 16, 2006, 21:50)
- Re: The bluestone debate (CraigR, Jun 15, 2006, 08:28)
- Re: The bluestone debate (korgilud, Jun 21, 2006, 01:00)
- Last British ice sheet (riverman, Jun 21, 2006, 13:50)
- Re: The bluestone debate (TheDazman, Aug 24, 2008, 23:15)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Nov 14, 2008, 18:29)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Stoneshifter, Nov 14, 2008, 18:48)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tiompan, Nov 14, 2008, 18:52)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 15, 2008, 08:51)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Nov 15, 2008, 10:03)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 15, 2008, 10:32)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Nov 15, 2008, 11:24)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 15, 2008, 12:30)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Stoneshifter, Nov 15, 2008, 14:32)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 15, 2008, 17:59)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Stoneshifter, Nov 15, 2008, 18:42)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 15, 2008, 19:07)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Nov 16, 2008, 14:54)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 16, 2008, 16:12)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Stoneshifter, Nov 16, 2008, 16:34)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Nov 16, 2008, 17:38)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 16, 2008, 17:51)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Nov 16, 2008, 23:06)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 17, 2008, 06:06)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Stoneshifter, Nov 17, 2008, 07:50)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Nov 17, 2008, 09:26)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 17, 2008, 09:44)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Nov 17, 2008, 10:22)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Stoneshifter, Nov 17, 2008, 12:05)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tiompan, Nov 17, 2008, 12:37)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Nov 17, 2008, 13:41)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 17, 2008, 14:55)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 17, 2008, 18:39)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 18, 2008, 05:22)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 18, 2008, 08:40)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 18, 2008, 09:06)
- Bluestones (Stoneshifter, Nov 18, 2008, 10:39)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 18, 2008, 10:59)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 18, 2008, 11:56)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 18, 2008, 14:28)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 18, 2008, 15:34)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 18, 2008, 15:48)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 18, 2008, 16:38)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tiompan, Nov 18, 2008, 16:44)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 18, 2008, 17:50)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 18, 2008, 18:36)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 18, 2008, 20:57)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 18, 2008, 21:43)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 18, 2008, 22:21)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 18, 2008, 22:42)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 18, 2008, 23:32)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 19, 2008, 17:35)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 19, 2008, 21:12)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 19, 2008, 21:29)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 19, 2008, 22:26)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 19, 2008, 23:52)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 20, 2008, 07:23)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 20, 2008, 10:40)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 20, 2008, 11:05)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 20, 2008, 11:40)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Nov 20, 2008, 11:49)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 20, 2008, 15:46)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 20, 2008, 18:25)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tonyh, Nov 20, 2008, 18:42)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 20, 2008, 19:02)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 20, 2008, 19:16)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tonyh, Nov 20, 2008, 19:22)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 20, 2008, 19:39)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tonyh, Nov 20, 2008, 19:48)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tonyh, Nov 20, 2008, 20:10)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 20, 2008, 20:10)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tonyh, Nov 20, 2008, 20:19)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tonyh, Nov 20, 2008, 20:38)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Steve Gray, Nov 20, 2008, 21:02)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tonyh, Nov 20, 2008, 21:11)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tonyh, Nov 20, 2008, 21:13)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tonyh, Nov 20, 2008, 21:19)
- For what it's worth... (Moth, Nov 21, 2008, 02:33)
- Re: For what it's worth... (goffik, Nov 21, 2008, 12:14)
- Re: For what it's worth... (tonyh, Nov 21, 2008, 18:54)
- Re: For what it's worth... (tonyh, Nov 21, 2008, 21:04)
- Re: For what it's worth... (GordonP, Nov 21, 2008, 21:42)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tonyh, Nov 20, 2008, 18:07)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tonyh, Nov 18, 2008, 18:48)
- Bluestains debated (Stoneshifter, Nov 18, 2008, 20:06)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Dec 05, 2008, 20:18)
- Re: The bluestone debate (fitzcoraldo, Nov 17, 2008, 13:58)
- Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP, Nov 17, 2008, 17:05)
- Re: The bluestone debate (sleeptowin, Nov 18, 2008, 21:37)
- Re: The bluestone debate (sleeptowin, Nov 19, 2008, 12:42)
- Re: The bluestone debate (sleeptowin, Nov 20, 2008, 10:06)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Littlestone, Nov 22, 2008, 22:15)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Littlestone, Nov 23, 2008, 07:42)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Dec 13, 2008, 21:46)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Littlestone, Dec 13, 2008, 22:01)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Dec 13, 2008, 23:44)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tiompan, Dec 14, 2008, 00:05)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Littlestone, Dec 14, 2008, 00:28)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tiompan, Dec 14, 2008, 09:44)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Dec 14, 2008, 10:33)
- Re: The bluestone debate (moss, Dec 14, 2008, 10:37)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Dec 14, 2008, 11:43)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Dec 14, 2008, 12:01)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tiompan, Dec 14, 2008, 12:05)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Dec 14, 2008, 14:34)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tiompan, Dec 14, 2008, 14:42)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tiompan, Dec 14, 2008, 14:57)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Dec 14, 2008, 15:12)
- Re: The bluestone debate (mountainman, Dec 15, 2008, 14:35)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tiompan, Dec 15, 2008, 16:17)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Dec 16, 2008, 07:01)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Littlestone, Dec 16, 2008, 16:39)
- Re: The bluestone debate (tiompan, Dec 18, 2008, 17:24)
- Re: The bluestone debate (Littlestone, Dec 14, 2008, 15:22)
- Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift, Dec 14, 2008, 02:35)
- Re: The bluestone debate (jimthewanderer, Mar 08, 2017, 02:00)
|
|