> I think we need to set rules for what is added to the site.
> For example what is a standing stone?
From the submission guidelines...
"The Modern Antiquarian focuses on megalithic sites and the ancient (i.e. prehistoric) landscape. This means we are not interested in Roman sites, Dark Ages sites, churches etc. unless they have clear prehistoric provenances (and you are prepared to tell us about them)."
"Wherever possible, back up your assertions and supply references for your quotations."
That says it as far as I'm concerned.
K x
Reply | with quote | Posted by Kammer 1st March 2006ce 20:44 |
Is this really a standing stone? (Kammer, Mar 01, 2006, 13:28)- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Rhiannon, Mar 01, 2006, 13:44)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Vybik Jon, Mar 01, 2006, 13:54)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (wolfnighthunter, Mar 01, 2006, 14:27)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (FourWinds, Mar 01, 2006, 14:43)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (wolfnighthunter, Mar 01, 2006, 14:46)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Kammer, Mar 01, 2006, 14:55)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Moth, Mar 01, 2006, 14:56)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Kammer, Mar 01, 2006, 18:41)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Vybik Jon, Mar 01, 2006, 18:44)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Moth, Mar 01, 2006, 18:52)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (StoneLifter, Mar 01, 2006, 18:53)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (moss, Mar 02, 2006, 07:35)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (StoneLifter, Mar 01, 2006, 18:11)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (jason lives, Mar 01, 2006, 17:40)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Hob, Mar 01, 2006, 17:48)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (wideford, Mar 02, 2006, 12:35)
|
|