|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian Popping Stone Forum | Start a topic | Search |
71 messages | Select a forum: |
| That's interesting Moth. It's only one perspective though, based largely on supposition. I suppose it's more than we had before though. At least someone is making a half convincing argument that the stone might have been of significance pre-Sir Walter Scott. It's all a bit tenuous though. It wouldn't stand up in court. :-)# K x Reply | with quote |  1st March 2006ce 18:41 In reply to: Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Moth)4 replies: Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Vybik Jon) Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Moth) Re: Is this really a standing stone? (StoneLifter) Re: Is this really a standing stone? (moss) |
Messages in this topic: |